Electrocoin Automatics Ltd. v Coinworld Ltd & Ors
The trade marks BAR-X and OXO are valid and not invalid for lack of distinctiveness, descriptiveness, or customary use. The defendants' use of BEAR X and the symbols BAR, X, and O on gaming machines and in advertising does not infringe the trade marks, as such use is not as a trade mark but as traditional, descriptive game elements, and is in accordance with honest commercial practices. There is no likelihood of confusion or unfair advantage/detriment established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Electrocoin Automatics Limited; Defendant: Coinworld Limited; Defendant: Thomas John Evans; Defendant: Ernest Keith Ingram
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property (trade Mark) Action / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claims for invalidity and infringement dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Validity, Trade Mark Infringement, Distinctiveness, Descriptiveness, Use in the Course of Trade, Honest Commercial Practices
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Electrocoin Automatics Limited
Claimant
Coinworld Limited
Defendant
Thomas John Evans
Defendant
Ernest Keith Ingram
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property (trade Mark) Action / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trade marks BAR-X and OXO are invalid for lack of distinctiveness, descriptiveness, or customary use under UK and Community law
- 2 Whether the defendants infringed the trade marks by use of similar signs and symbols on gaming machines and in advertising
- 3 Whether the use of the symbols BAR, X, and O on reels and win tables constitutes trade mark use or descriptive use
Ratio Decidendi
The trade marks BAR-X and OXO are valid and not invalid for lack of distinctiveness, descriptiveness, or customary use. The defendants' use of BEAR X and the symbols BAR, X, and O on gaming machines and in advertising does not infringe the trade marks, as such use is not as a trade mark but as traditional, descriptive game elements, and is in accordance with honest commercial practices. There is no likelihood of confusion or unfair advantage/detriment established.
Court Disposition
Claims for invalidity and infringement dismissed
Orders
- Claims for invalidity and infringement are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment