Watford Control Instruments Ltd v Brown [2023] EWHC 32 (Ch) (12 January 2023)
Although the claimant's conduct amounted to abuse of process due to prolonged delay and inadequate justification, striking out the claim would be disproportionate; a more appropriate sanction is to order security for costs and disallow recovery of costs incurred during the period of delay.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 32 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Watford Control Instruments Limited; Defendant: Colin Brown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Strike Out Application / Post Case Management Conference, Pre Trial
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Want of Prosecution, Standing to Sue, Assignment of Claims, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Watford Control Instruments Limited
Claimant
Colin Brown
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Strike Out Application / Post Case Management Conference, Pre Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim should be struck out for abuse of process
- 2 Whether the claim should be struck out for want of prosecution
- 3 Whether the claimant has standing to sue due to assignment issues
Ratio Decidendi
Although the claimant's conduct amounted to abuse of process due to prolonged delay and inadequate justification, striking out the claim would be disproportionate; a more appropriate sanction is to order security for costs and disallow recovery of costs incurred during the period of delay.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to provide security for defendant's costs of defending the claim
- Claimant barred from recovering costs incurred from September 2019 to September 2022
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment