Hall v Moore & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 201 (18 March 2009)
The rights of common attached to Moat House Farm passed to the tenant under the 1998 tenancy agreement as they were not effectively reserved by the contract, and the Powick Commons Committee lacked legal authority to waive or suspend proprietary rights of commoners without express consent or a binding constitution.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 201
- Parties
- Appellant: Colin Hall; Respondent: Shirley Moore; Respondent: Gerald Harris; Respondent: Cynthia Harris
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rights of Common, Tenancy, Waiver of Rights, Interpretation of Contracts, Commons Registration Act 1965, Law of Property Act 1925
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colin Hall
Appellant
Shirley Moore
Respondent
Gerald Harris
Respondent
Cynthia Harris
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rights of common attached to Moat House Farm passed to the tenant under the 1998 tenancy agreement
- 2 Whether the Powick Commons Committee had authority to waive rights of common on behalf of all commoners
Ratio Decidendi
The rights of common attached to Moat House Farm passed to the tenant under the 1998 tenancy agreement as they were not effectively reserved by the contract, and the Powick Commons Committee lacked legal authority to waive or suspend proprietary rights of commoners without express consent or a binding constitution.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Set aside the judge's orders in both actions
- Invite parties' representations as to further orders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment