Gabriel v Hayward & Ors
The amendment to the particulars of claim is allowed, subject to deletion of certain passages, because justice requires the claimant be permitted to proceed with a more detailed statement of case, despite the difficulties for the defendants, as the existing pleadings are unsatisfactory and the proposed amendments do not introduce claims bound to fail or outside the limitation period.
- Parties
- Claimant: Peter Gabriel; Defendant: Colin Hayward; Defendant: R. L. Carp; Defendant: D. M. Slann; Defendant: Cameron Smith; Defendant: Boyden Project Management Limited; Defendant: Sedley Place Limited; Defendant: Terry M. J. New; Defendant: Stephen Furlonger
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction/professional Negligence) / Application to Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Application to amend particulars of claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Particularity in Pleadings, Limitation, Professional Duties, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Gabriel
Claimant
Colin Hayward
Defendant
R. L. Carp
Defendant
D. M. Slann
Defendant
Cameron Smith
Defendant
Boyden Project Management Limited
Defendant
Sedley Place Limited
Defendant
Terry M. J. New
Defendant
Stephen Furlonger
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction/professional Negligence) / Application to Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be permitted to amend the particulars of claim by substitution
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments introduce new claims outside the limitation period
- 3 Whether the amended particulars are insufficiently particularized or prolix
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment to the particulars of claim is allowed, subject to deletion of certain passages, because justice requires the claimant be permitted to proceed with a more detailed statement of case, despite the difficulties for the defendants, as the existing pleadings are unsatisfactory and the proposed amendments do not introduce claims bound to fail or outside the limitation period.
Court Disposition
Application to amend particulars of claim allowed in part
Orders
- Proposed amendment to particulars of claim allowed, subject to deletion of certain passages as conceded and as specified in the judgment.
- Leave granted to defendants to amend their defences consequentially.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment