Meadows Care Ltd & Anor v Lambert & Anor

Meadows Care Ltd & Anor v Lambert & Anor

The words complained of were an expression of opinion about systemic and legislative defects in the operation of private care homes, not an allegation of culpable behaviour or negligence by the claimants or their staff. Therefore, the claimants failed to establish that the words bore a defamatory meaning against them.

Parties
Claimant: Meadows Care Limited; Claimant: Pathfinders Childcare Limited; Defendant: Colin Lambert; Defendant: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Slander / Ruling on Permission to Re Amend Particulars of Claim and Preliminary Determination of Meaning
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Slander, Expression of Opinion Vs Statement of Fact, Defamatory Meaning, Permission to Amend Pleadings
Defamation Tort Slander Expression of Opinion Vs Statement of Fact Defamatory Meaning Permission to Amend Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Meadows Care Limited

Claimant

Pathfinders Childcare Limited

Claimant

Colin Lambert

Defendant

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Slander / Ruling on Permission to Re Amend Particulars of Claim and Preliminary Determination of Meaning

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the words complained of bear a defamatory meaning against the claimants
  2. 2 Whether the words are an expression of opinion or a statement of fact
  3. 3 Whether permission should be granted to re-amend the particulars of claim

Ratio Decidendi

The words complained of were an expression of opinion about systemic and legislative defects in the operation of private care homes, not an allegation of culpable behaviour or negligence by the claimants or their staff. Therefore, the claimants failed to establish that the words bore a defamatory meaning against them.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to re-amend particulars of claim refused
  • Claim for slander dismissed