- v - (Eastern : collective enfranchisement) [2014] UKFTT RP_CAM_33UG_OCE_20130014 (11 March 2014)

Bullen should not be a party to the tribunal as it agreed to the premium; legal costs allowed for Bullen but not valuation costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2014] UKFTT RP_CAM_33UG_OCE_20130014
Parties: Nominee Purchaser: SM at Pleas Properties Limited; Party to Tribunal: Bullen
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 11 March 2014
Procedural Posture: Collective Enfranchisement / Decision
Outcome: Bullen removed as party; legal costs awarded to Bullen; valuation costs not awarded.
Legal Topics: Collective Enfranchisement, Party Status, Legal Costs

Property Law Collective Enfranchisement Party Status Legal Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

SM at Pleas Properties Limited

Nominee Purchaser

Bullen

Party to Tribunal

Procedural Posture

Collective Enfranchisement / Decision

Legal Issues

1 Should Bullen be a party to the tribunal given its agreement to the premium?
2 Entitlement to legal costs in collective enfranchisement proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Bullen should not be a party to the tribunal as it agreed to the premium; legal costs allowed for Bullen but not valuation costs.

Court Disposition

Bullen removed as party; legal costs awarded to Bullen; valuation costs not awarded.

Orders

Bullen allowed £650 legal costs
Counsel fees allowed in full

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.