Murphy v Gooch

Murphy v Gooch

The court held that Ms Murphy is entitled to set off the full amount of Mr Gooch's credits for interest and rent payments by a credit for occupation rent, cancelling them in full, and that the statutory principles under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 must be applied rather than the equitable accounting doctrine. The value of Ms Murphy's half interest is £11,280, and Mr Gooch is given the option to purchase her share at this value, subject to indemnity and release from mortgage liability.

Parties
Appellant: Collete Murphy; Respondent: Ian Gooch
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Co Ownership, Equitable Accounting, Occupation Rent, Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, Order for Sale, Beneficial Interests
Property Law Trusts Co Ownership Equitable Accounting Occupation Rent Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 Order for Sale Beneficial Interests

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Collete Murphy

Appellant

Ian Gooch

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ms Murphy is entitled to offset a credit for occupation rent against Mr Gooch's credits for payments made in respect of the property
  2. 2 Whether Mr Gooch is entitled to credits for payments made before 1994 and after 1999
  3. 3 Whether the doctrine of equitable accounting or the statutory principles under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 apply

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Ms Murphy is entitled to set off the full amount of Mr Gooch's credits for interest and rent payments by a credit for occupation rent, cancelling them in full, and that the statutory principles under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 must be applied rather than the equitable accounting doctrine. The value of Ms Murphy's half interest is £11,280, and Mr Gooch is given the option to purchase her share at this value, subject to indemnity and release from mortgage liability.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Ms Murphy entitled to set off occupation rent against Mr Gooch's credits for interest and rent, cancelling them in full
  • Mr Gooch given option to purchase Ms Murphy's half share for £11,280 within three months, subject to mortgage indemnity and best endeavours to secure her release from liability