Colt Telecom Group Plc, Re [2002] EWHC 2815 (Ch) (20 December 2002)
The administration petition is barred by the no-action clause in the Indenture under New York law, which applies to this claim; English public policy does not override the clause; insolvency is not proved on either cash-flow or balance sheet basis; the court is not satisfied that Colt is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts.
- Citation
- [2002] EWHC 2815 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Highberry Ltd and Highberry LLC; Respondent: Colt Telecom Group plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Administration Petition Under Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment on Contested Petition
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Administration Order, No Action Clause, Public Policy, Insolvency Tests, Bondholder Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Highberry Ltd and Highberry LLC
Petitioner
Colt Telecom Group plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administration Petition Under Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment on Contested Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Threshold for proving likely insolvency under s.8(1) Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Effect of no-action clause in Indenture under New York law
- 3 Whether English public policy overrides contractual fetters on administration petitions
Ratio Decidendi
The administration petition is barred by the no-action clause in the Indenture under New York law, which applies to this claim; English public policy does not override the clause; insolvency is not proved on either cash-flow or balance sheet basis; the court is not satisfied that Colt is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- administration petition dismissed
- no administration order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment