Commerzbank Ag v Keen
The Bank had a wide contractual discretion over bonuses, and Mr Keen failed to show any real prospect of establishing irrationality or perversity in the exercise of that discretion for 2003 and 2004. The contract clearly excluded bonus entitlement for 2005 if not employed at the payment date, and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 did not apply to the employment contract in this context.
- Parties
- Appellant: Commerzbank AG; Respondent: James Keen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment Refusal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Summary judgment granted for the Bank. Mr Keen's claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Discretionary Bonus, Implied Terms, Summary Judgment, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commerzbank AG
Appellant
James Keen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer exercised its discretion on bonus payments irrationally or perversely in breach of contract for 2003 and 2004.
- 2 Whether the refusal to pay a bonus for 2005 was a breach of contract or contrary to the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
Ratio Decidendi
The Bank had a wide contractual discretion over bonuses, and Mr Keen failed to show any real prospect of establishing irrationality or perversity in the exercise of that discretion for 2003 and 2004. The contract clearly excluded bonus entitlement for 2005 if not employed at the payment date, and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 did not apply to the employment contract in this context.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Summary judgment granted for the Bank. Mr Keen's claims dismissed.
Orders
- Order of Morison J set aside.
- Bank's application for summary judgment granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment