Nicholls v Nicholls [1996] EWCA Civ 1271 (20th December, 1996)
Procedural defects in committal orders do not require the order to be set aside unless they cause injustice or prejudice to the contemnor; the court has discretion to amend or uphold such orders in the interests of justice.
- Citation
- [1996] EWCA Civ 1271
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: Angela Mary Nicholls; Respondent/appellant: Sidney John Nicholls; Amicus: Hugo Keith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Worcester County Court to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Committal Orders, Procedural Irregularities, Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Undertakings, Amendment of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Mary Nicholls
Petitioner/respondent
Sidney John Nicholls
Respondent/appellant
Hugo Keith
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Worcester County Court to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether procedural defects in committal orders render them invalid or capable of amendment
- 2 Whether the interests of justice require setting aside or amending defective committal orders
- 3 Whether the contemnor suffered prejudice due to procedural defects
Ratio Decidendi
Procedural defects in committal orders do not require the order to be set aside unless they cause injustice or prejudice to the contemnor; the court has discretion to amend or uphold such orders in the interests of justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Committal order for 14 days imprisonment set aside
- Suspended committal order activated but sentence reduced so contemnor need not return to prison
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment