Nicholls v Nicholls [1996] EWCA Civ 1271 (20th December, 1996)

Nicholls v Nicholls [1996] EWCA Civ 1271 (20th December, 1996)

Procedural defects in committal orders do not require the order to be set aside unless they cause injustice or prejudice to the contemnor; the court has discretion to amend or uphold such orders in the interests of justice.

Citation
[1996] EWCA Civ 1271
Parties
Petitioner/respondent: Angela Mary Nicholls; Respondent/appellant: Sidney John Nicholls; Amicus: Hugo Keith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Worcester County Court to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Committal Orders, Procedural Irregularities, Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Undertakings, Amendment of Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Angela Mary Nicholls

Petitioner/respondent

Sidney John Nicholls

Respondent/appellant

Hugo Keith

Amicus

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Worcester County Court to Court of Appeal (civil Division)

  1. 1 Whether procedural defects in committal orders render them invalid or capable of amendment
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice require setting aside or amending defective committal orders
  3. 3 Whether the contemnor suffered prejudice due to procedural defects

Ratio Decidendi

Procedural defects in committal orders do not require the order to be set aside unless they cause injustice or prejudice to the contemnor; the court has discretion to amend or uphold such orders in the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Committal order for 14 days imprisonment set aside
  • Suspended committal order activated but sentence reduced so contemnor need not return to prison