Royal Mail Group Ltd v Communication Workers Union [2020] EWHC 842 (QB) (08 April 2020)
Summary judgment is refused because there are disputed issues of fact regarding whether the Defendant induced the strike action, and these issues require a full trial for proper resolution. The Defendant's case, while improbable, still has a real prospect of success and there are compelling reasons for a trial.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 842 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Royal Mail Group Limited; Defendant: Communication Workers Union
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment on Liability for Inducement to Breach of Contract
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment refused
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Action, Summary Judgment, Inducement to Breach of Contract, Trade Union Liability, Collective Agreements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Mail Group Limited
Claimant
Communication Workers Union
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment on Liability for Inducement to Breach of Contract
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant induced a breach of contract by encouraging unballoted strike action
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted where there are disputed issues of fact
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment is refused because there are disputed issues of fact regarding whether the Defendant induced the strike action, and these issues require a full trial for proper resolution. The Defendant's case, while improbable, still has a real prospect of success and there are compelling reasons for a trial.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment refused
Orders
- Claim proceeds to trial on the issues of inducement to breach of contract and related matters
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment