Weymede Litho Printers Ltd v Runnymede Borough Council [2002] EWLands ACQ_81_2001 (22 January 2002)
Repayment of the bank loan is not an admissible head of claim for compensation as there is no evidence of loss attributable to compulsory acquisition; loss on forced sale was already compensated, and the overdraft was not subject to penalty or advantageous terms warranting additional compensation.
- Citation
- [2002] EWLands ACQ_81_2001
- Parties
- Claimant: Weymede Litho Printers Limited; Acquiring Authority: Runnymede Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Determination / Final Determination Without Hearing
- Outcome
- claim dismissed as to bank loan head of claim
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Disturbance, Remoteness of Damage, Business Valuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Weymede Litho Printers Limited
Claimant
Runnymede Borough Council
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compensation Determination / Final Determination Without Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Is repayment of a bank loan an admissible head of claim for compensation under compulsory purchase disturbance?
- 2 Is there a causal connection between the compulsory acquisition and the alleged loss from early discharge of the overdraft?
Ratio Decidendi
Repayment of the bank loan is not an admissible head of claim for compensation as there is no evidence of loss attributable to compulsory acquisition; loss on forced sale was already compensated, and the overdraft was not subject to penalty or advantageous terms warranting additional compensation.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed as to bank loan head of claim
Orders
- No additional compensation payable beyond settlement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment