Howard v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] EWLands ACQ_117_2001 (21 March 2002)

Howard v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] EWLands ACQ_117_2001 (21 March 2002)

The property must be valued in its actual condition at the valuation date, as the claimant failed to prove that disrepair was caused by the Council or impending acquisition. The claimant acted unreasonably in not completing agreed sales and not maintaining the property. No compensation is due for loss of rent as the property was vacant due to disrepair, not the threat of acquisition, and no evidence supports the claimed amounts.

Citation
[2002] EWLands ACQ_117_2001
Parties
Claimant: David Howard; Acquiring Authority: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Acquisition Compensation / Final Determination
Outcome
claim partly allowed
Legal Topics
Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition, Valuation of Derelict Property, Loss of Rent, Causation of Disrepair
Property Law Compulsory Purchase Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition Valuation of Derelict Property Loss of Rent Causation of Disrepair

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Howard

Claimant

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Acquiring Authority

Procedural Posture

Compulsory Acquisition Compensation / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the proper compensation for the compulsory acquisition of a derelict property?
  2. 2 Should disrepair caused by impending acquisition be disregarded in valuation?
  3. 3 Is the claimant entitled to compensation for loss of rent?

Ratio Decidendi

The property must be valued in its actual condition at the valuation date, as the claimant failed to prove that disrepair was caused by the Council or impending acquisition. The claimant acted unreasonably in not completing agreed sales and not maintaining the property. No compensation is due for loss of rent as the property was vacant due to disrepair, not the threat of acquisition, and no evidence supports the claimed amounts.

Court Disposition

claim partly allowed

Orders

  • Market value of the long leasehold interest determined at £7,500 as at 13 June 2000.
  • No compensation awarded for loss of rent.