Gallaher Group Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Competition and Markets Authority
The OFT's assurances to TM Retail regarding repayment of penalties in the event of successful third-party appeals were given in error and without proper consideration of the principles of finality and legal certainty. The claimants, who did not request similar assurances and chose not to appeal, are barred by the principle of finality from benefiting from successful appeals by others. The mistake made in favour of TM Retail does not justify replication for the claimants, especially where public funds are concerned.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gallaher Group Limited; Claimant: Gallaher Limited; Claimant: Somerfield Stores Limited; Claimant: Co-operative Group Food Limited; Defendant: Competition and Markets Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Early Resolution Agreements, Penalty Payments, Fairness and Equal Treatment, Legal Certainty, Finality of Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gallaher Group Limited
Claimant
Gallaher Limited
Claimant
Somerfield Stores Limited
Claimant
Co-operative Group Food Limited
Claimant
Competition and Markets Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the OFT breached its duty of fairness and equal treatment by giving assurances to TM Retail not offered to other parties
- 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to repayment of penalties paid under Early Resolution Agreements due to assurances given to TM Retail
- 3 Whether the principle of finality and legal certainty bars the claimants from benefiting from successful appeals by other parties
Ratio Decidendi
The OFT's assurances to TM Retail regarding repayment of penalties in the event of successful third-party appeals were given in error and without proper consideration of the principles of finality and legal certainty. The claimants, who did not request similar assurances and chose not to appeal, are barred by the principle of finality from benefiting from successful appeals by others. The mistake made in favour of TM Retail does not justify replication for the claimants, especially where public funds are concerned.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment