THE QUEEN (on the application of SSE GENERATION LIMITED & Ors) v COMPETITION AND MARKETS AUTHORITY
GEMA's approval of the CUSC modification failed to secure compliance with Regulation 838/2010 because it did not properly reflect the connection exclusion, constituting an error of law. The CMA erred in upholding this decision. However, the challenge to GEMA's interpretation of the connection exclusion and the application of the ancillary services exclusion failed, as these were matters of regulatory evaluation and statutory interpretation properly exercised.
- Parties
- Claimant: SSE Generation Limited; Claimant: Keadby Generation Limited; Claimant: Medway Power Limited; Claimant: Griffin Windfarm Limited; Claimant: SSE Renewables (UK) Limited; Claimant: Keadby Windfarm Limited; Claimant: Strathy Wind Farm Limited; Defendant: Competition and Markets Authority; Interested Party: Gas and Electricity Markets Authority; Interested Party: National Grid Electricity System Operator Limited; Interested Party: Centrica PLC; Interested Party: British Gas Trading Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Electricity Transmission Charges, Regulatory Compliance, Judicial Review, Interpretation of EU Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SSE Generation Limited
Claimant
Keadby Generation Limited
Claimant
Medway Power Limited
Claimant
Griffin Windfarm Limited
Claimant
SSE Renewables (UK) Limited
Claimant
Keadby Windfarm Limited
Claimant
Strathy Wind Farm Limited
Claimant
Competition and Markets Authority
Defendant
Gas and Electricity Markets Authority
Interested Party
National Grid Electricity System Operator Limited
Interested Party
Centrica PLC
Interested Party
British Gas Trading Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether GEMA's approval of CUSC modification complied with Regulation 838/2010
- 2 Correct interpretation of the 'connection exclusion' in Regulation 838/2010
- 3 Proper application of the 'ancillary services exclusion' in Regulation 838/2010
Ratio Decidendi
GEMA's approval of the CUSC modification failed to secure compliance with Regulation 838/2010 because it did not properly reflect the connection exclusion, constituting an error of law. The CMA erred in upholding this decision. However, the challenge to GEMA's interpretation of the connection exclusion and the application of the ancillary services exclusion failed, as these were matters of regulatory evaluation and statutory interpretation properly exercised.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed
Orders
- SSE Generation Limited's challenge succeeds on Ground 1; GEMA's decision on CUSC modification quashed to the extent it failed to secure compliance with Regulation 838/2010.
- Challenge fails on Grounds 2 and 3; no further relief granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment