Wales & West Utilities Limited v Competition and Markets Authority

Wales & West Utilities Limited v Competition and Markets Authority

SSEN-T was a party to the joined appeals before the CMA tribunal and is therefore an interested party under PD 54A 4.6(2). SSEN-T is directly affected by the claim, as the legal framework and any relief granted would impact its position in the joined appeals. SSEN-T's submissions do not constitute new, independent grounds but illustrate the practical effect of the error alleged by the Claimant. There is no requirement for permission to advance such submissions under CPR 54.14(1). The Defendant's application to exclude or limit SSEN-T's participation, or to strike out its submissions, is refused.

Parties
Claimant: Wales & West Utilities Limited; Defendant: Competition and Markets Authority; Interested Party: Gas and Electricity Markets Authority; Interested Party: Cadent Gas Limited; Interested Party: National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC; Interested Party: National Gas Transmission PLC; Interested Party: Northern Gas Networks Limited; Interested Party: Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission PLC; Interested Party: Southern Gas Networks PLC; Interested Party: Scotland Gas Networks PLC; Interested Party: SP Transmission PLC; Interested Party: British Gas Trading Limited; Interested Party: Citizens Advice; Interested Party: Water Services Regulation Authority; Interested Party: Electricity North West Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Defendant's application refused in its entirety; SSEN-T remains an interested party; directions to be given for substantive hearing.
Legal Topics
Standing of Interested Parties, Judicial Review Procedure, Statutory Interpretation, Appellate Tribunal Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wales & West Utilities Limited

Claimant

Competition and Markets Authority

Defendant

Gas and Electricity Markets Authority

Interested Party

Cadent Gas Limited

Interested Party

National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC

Interested Party

National Gas Transmission PLC

Interested Party

Northern Gas Networks Limited

Interested Party

Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission PLC

Interested Party

Southern Gas Networks PLC

Interested Party

Scotland Gas Networks PLC

Interested Party

SP Transmission PLC

Interested Party

British Gas Trading Limited

Interested Party

Citizens Advice

Interested Party

Water Services Regulation Authority

Interested Party

Electricity North West Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission PLC (SSEN-T) is an interested party in the judicial review proceedings under CPR 54.1(2)(f) and PD 54A 4.6(2)
  2. 2 Whether SSEN-T may advance detailed grounds supporting the claim, including by reference to the Cost of Equity issue
  3. 3 Whether SSEN-T's submissions constitute impermissible new grounds requiring permission

Ratio Decidendi

SSEN-T was a party to the joined appeals before the CMA tribunal and is therefore an interested party under PD 54A 4.6(2). SSEN-T is directly affected by the claim, as the legal framework and any relief granted would impact its position in the joined appeals. SSEN-T's submissions do not constitute new, independent grounds but illustrate the practical effect of the error alleged by the Claimant. There is no requirement for permission to advance such submissions under CPR 54.14(1). The Defendant's application to exclude or limit SSEN-T's participation, or to strike out its submissions, is refused.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application refused in its entirety; SSEN-T remains an interested party; directions to be given for substantive hearing.

Orders

  • Defendant's application to remove SSEN-T as interested party refused.
  • Defendant's application to strike out or limit SSEN-T's detailed grounds refused.