Competition and Markets Authority v Apple Inc & Ors
The CMA's standalone power under section 131(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 is not curtailed by the time limits or procedures in sections 131A and 131B following a prior decision not to make a MIR after a MSN. The Decision to make a MIR was intra vires and lawful, as the statutory language does not impose a permanent bar, and public law principles do not require such a restriction in the absence of irrationality or improper purpose.
- Parties
- Appellant: Competition and Markets Authority; Respondent: Apple Inc; Respondent: Apple Distribution International Ltd; Respondent: Apple Europe Ltd; Respondent: Apple (UK) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Market Investigation Reference, Jurisdiction of Competition Authority, Statutory Interpretation, Public Law Constraints
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition and Markets Authority
Appellant
Apple Inc
Respondent
Apple Distribution International Ltd
Respondent
Apple Europe Ltd
Respondent
Apple (UK) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) had jurisdiction under the Enterprise Act 2002 to make a market investigation reference (MIR) after previously deciding not to do so without issuing a further market study notice (MSN)
- 2 Interpretation of sections 131, 131A, and 131B of the Enterprise Act 2002 regarding the CMA's powers and time limits
- 3 Whether public law principles constrain the CMA's exercise of the standalone power under section 131
Ratio Decidendi
The CMA's standalone power under section 131(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 is not curtailed by the time limits or procedures in sections 131A and 131B following a prior decision not to make a MIR after a MSN. The Decision to make a MIR was intra vires and lawful, as the statutory language does not impose a permanent bar, and public law principles do not require such a restriction in the absence of irrationality or improper purpose.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Competition Appeal Tribunal set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment