Halil v London Borough of Lambeth [2001] EWLands ACQ_105_1999 (02 March 2001)
Compensation for total extinguishment of a protected tenant's business following compulsory acquisition is to be calculated as three times the average adjusted net profit, with no deduction for the wife's earnings (as she was not an employee but a partner in the business), and no deduction for depreciation given the minimal and aged capital employed. The multiplier of 3 reflects the value to the claimant, his age, business stability, and inability to re-establish elsewhere.
- Citation
- [2001] EWLands ACQ_105_1999
- Parties
- Claimant: Ali Kamuran Halil; Acquiring Authority: London Borough of Lambeth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Reference / Final Determination and Costs Order
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition of Leasehold, Business Extinguishment, Disturbance Compensation, Valuation of Business, Treatment of Spouse's Earnings, Depreciation of Capital Assets, Application of Multiplier, Protected Tenancy, Land Compensation Act 1973 S46 and S47, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali Kamuran Halil
Claimant
London Borough of Lambeth
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Reference / Final Determination and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate compensation for disturbance on total extinguishment of business following compulsory acquisition
- 2 Treatment of claimant's wife's earnings in business valuation
- 3 Treatment of depreciation of capital assets in profit calculation
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation for total extinguishment of a protected tenant's business following compulsory acquisition is to be calculated as three times the average adjusted net profit, with no deduction for the wife's earnings (as she was not an employee but a partner in the business), and no deduction for depreciation given the minimal and aged capital employed. The multiplier of 3 reflects the value to the claimant, his age, business stability, and inability to re-establish elsewhere.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- Acquiring authority to pay claimant compensation for disturbance in the sum of £73,176.
- Acquiring authority to pay claimant's costs of the reference, less costs associated with specified interim applications, to be agreed or assessed on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment