Stewart Christopher Chivers & Anor v St Helens Borough Council
The evidence did not establish that Mr Chivers was entitled to compensation for lease breakage, as the lease arrangements were unorthodox, unregistered, and lacked proof of binding obligations or actual loss. Pre-reference professional costs were recoverable in part, subject to reasonableness and supporting evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant: Stewart Christopher Chivers; Claimant: Prestige Motors Direct Ltd; Acquiring Authority: St Helens Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Purchase Compensation Reference / Final Determination and Costs Assessment
- Outcome
- Issue 1 (lease breakage) dismissed; Issue 2 (pre-reference costs) allowed in part; costs awarded to claimants with adjustment for partial success.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Purchase Order, Lease Breakage, Pre Reference Professional Costs, Land Compensation, Costs of Reference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stewart Christopher Chivers
Claimant
Prestige Motors Direct Ltd
Claimant
St Helens Borough Council
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Purchase Compensation Reference / Final Determination and Costs Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to compensation for lease breakage of car showroom on Plot D
- 2 Quantum of pre-reference professional costs recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish that Mr Chivers was entitled to compensation for lease breakage, as the lease arrangements were unorthodox, unregistered, and lacked proof of binding obligations or actual loss. Pre-reference professional costs were recoverable in part, subject to reasonableness and supporting evidence.
Court Disposition
Issue 1 (lease breakage) dismissed; Issue 2 (pre-reference costs) allowed in part; costs awarded to claimants with adjustment for partial success.
Orders
- Claim for compensation for lease breakage dismissed.
- Claimants awarded £198,959.65 as pre-reference professional costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment