Conarken Group Ltd & Anor v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Rev 1)
Network Rail is entitled to recover from the appellants the Schedule 8 payments made to TOCs as damages for economic loss directly consequent upon physical damage to its property caused by the appellants' negligence. Such losses, including those calculated by reference to marginal revenue effect and societal rate, are not too remote and were reasonably foreseeable. The contractual arrangements between Network Rail and the TOCs do not, by themselves, extend or limit the appellants' liability, but the losses claimed fall within established principles of recoverable consequential economic loss in tort.
- Parties
- Appellant: Conarken Group Limited; Appellant: Farrell Transport Limited; Respondent: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Economic Loss, Remoteness of Damage, Damages, Liability for Consequential Loss, Foreseeability, Duty of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conarken Group Limited
Appellant
Farrell Transport Limited
Appellant
Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Network Rail can recover from the appellants damages for economic loss (Schedule 8 payments to TOCs) consequent upon physical damage to its property caused by the appellants' negligence.
- 2 Whether such losses are too remote or not reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable in tort.
Ratio Decidendi
Network Rail is entitled to recover from the appellants the Schedule 8 payments made to TOCs as damages for economic loss directly consequent upon physical damage to its property caused by the appellants' negligence. Such losses, including those calculated by reference to marginal revenue effect and societal rate, are not too remote and were reasonably foreseeable. The contractual arrangements between Network Rail and the TOCs do not, by themselves, extend or limit the appellants' liability, but the losses claimed fall within established principles of recoverable consequential economic loss in tort.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The judgment of the Technology and Construction Court awarding damages to Network Rail Infrastructure Limited is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment