Birmingham City Council v Crook & Ors
The CFA was enforceable as it did not provide for a success fee but a discount from normal fees; any breach in advice regarding Legal Help costs was immaterial and did not affect client protection or justice; advice on public funding was reasonable and compliant; the CBA was only relevant if the CFA was unenforceable, which was not the case.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Birmingham City Council; Respondents/claimants: Ricky and Jennifer Crook (and 9 others)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Public Funding, Housing Disrepair, Solicitor Client Retainer, Costs Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birmingham City Council
Appellant/defendant
Ricky and Jennifer Crook (and 9 others)
Respondents/claimants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 enforceability of conditional fee agreement (CFA)
- 2 compliance with Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000
- 3 adequacy of solicitor's advice on funding options
Ratio Decidendi
The CFA was enforceable as it did not provide for a success fee but a discount from normal fees; any breach in advice regarding Legal Help costs was immaterial and did not affect client protection or justice; advice on public funding was reasonable and compliant; the CBA was only relevant if the CFA was unenforceable, which was not the case.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- decision of Master Campbell re-affirmed
- no change to costs liability
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment