Teasdale, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 1217 (03 October 2024)

Teasdale, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 1217 (03 October 2024)

The applicant's grounds are not reasonably arguable as the confiscation order was lawful, previously upheld, and enforcement by appointment of a receiver is necessary and proportionate. No procedural or human rights errors were found.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Crim 1217
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant/defendant: Malcolm Teasdale
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Order Appointing Enforcement Receiver
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Enforcement Receiver, Appeal Procedure, Human Rights, Proceeds of Crime Act
Criminal Law Proceeds of Crime Confiscation Order Enforcement Receiver Appeal Procedure Human Rights Proceeds of Crime Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Malcolm Teasdale

Applicant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Order Appointing Enforcement Receiver

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appointment of an Enforcement Receiver was lawful and proportionate
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's human rights were breached by the order
  3. 3 Whether there was procedural error or misconduct by the prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's grounds are not reasonably arguable as the confiscation order was lawful, previously upheld, and enforcement by appointment of a receiver is necessary and proportionate. No procedural or human rights errors were found.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal refused