Smithkline Beecham Biologicals SA v Connaught Laboratories Inc [1999] EWCA Civ 1781 (7 July 1999)

Smithkline Beecham Biologicals SA v Connaught Laboratories Inc [1999] EWCA Civ 1781 (7 July 1999)

Documents pre-read by the judge and referred to in open court, even in a compendious manner, are covered by Order 24 rule 14A, releasing the recipient from the implied obligation of confidentiality unless the court orders otherwise. The hearing, though brief, constituted a trial and the judge's decision was based on the material before him, including the disputed documents.

Citation
[1999] EWCA Civ 1781
Parties
Petitioner/appellant: SmithKline Beecham Biologicals SA; Respondent: Connaught Laboratories Inc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 July 1999
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation Appeal / Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division, Patents Court
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Patent Revocation, Confidentiality of Documents, Open Justice, Use of Discovery Documents
Intellectual Property Civil Procedure Patent Revocation Confidentiality of Documents Open Justice Use of Discovery Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SmithKline Beecham Biologicals SA

Petitioner/appellant

Connaught Laboratories Inc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Patent Revocation Appeal / Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division, Patents Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether documents disclosed in litigation and marked confidential may be used for purposes other than the proceedings after being referred to in open court under Order 24 rule 14A
  2. 2 Interpretation of 'read to or by the Court, or referred to, in open Court' under Order 24 rule 14A

Ratio Decidendi

Documents pre-read by the judge and referred to in open court, even in a compendious manner, are covered by Order 24 rule 14A, releasing the recipient from the implied obligation of confidentiality unless the court orders otherwise. The hearing, though brief, constituted a trial and the judge's decision was based on the material before him, including the disputed documents.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Documents in categories A, B, C, and D are covered by Order 24 rule 14A and may be used for purposes other than the proceedings.
  • No order made to restrict disclosure of these documents.