Morrissey v McNicholas & Anor
The delay in prosecuting the action, though significant, was credibly explained and did not amount to abuse of process. The seriousness of the imputation and the extent of publication justified allowing the action to proceed. The prejudice alleged did not make a fair trial impossible, and striking out would be disproportionate.
- Parties
- Claimant: Stephen Patrick Morrissey; Defendant: Connor McNicholas; Defendant: IPC Media Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application to Strike Out for Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Delay in Prosecution, Abuse of Process, Fair Trial, Freedom of Expression, Reputation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Patrick Morrissey
Claimant
Connor McNicholas
Defendant
IPC Media Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application to Strike Out for Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the delay in prosecuting the libel action constitutes abuse of process
- 2 Whether the claim should be struck out under the Jameel principle for lack of legitimate purpose
- 3 Whether the delay has caused prejudice making a fair trial impossible
Ratio Decidendi
The delay in prosecuting the action, though significant, was credibly explained and did not amount to abuse of process. The seriousness of the imputation and the extent of publication justified allowing the action to proceed. The prejudice alleged did not make a fair trial impossible, and striking out would be disproportionate.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dismissed
Orders
- Parties invited to agree directions to bring the matter to trial at an early date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment