Crawford, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 711 (10 May 2023)
There were no arguable grounds of appeal against conviction or sentence; the evidence was strong, the jury's verdict was sound, and the sentencing judge applied the law correctly. The administratively imposed surcharge order was unlawful as it was not pronounced in open court.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 711
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Connor Peter Crawford
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Appeals, Sentencing, Extension of Time, Unsafe Conviction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Connor Peter Crawford
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against conviction for firearms offences
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 3 Whether an extension of time to seek leave to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
There were no arguable grounds of appeal against conviction or sentence; the evidence was strong, the jury's verdict was sound, and the sentencing judge applied the law correctly. The administratively imposed surcharge order was unlawful as it was not pronounced in open court.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Refusal of extension of time to apply for leave to appeal conviction and sentence
- Direction to amend Crown Court record to remove £181 surcharge order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment