R v Connor Wood
The judge erred by not suspending the appellant's sentence given the cumulative effect of strong mitigation, low risk of reoffending, and prospects of rehabilitation, which outweighed the need for immediate custody in this case.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Connor Wood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence of immediate imprisonment quashed; replaced with suspended sentence
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Suspended Sentences, Parity in Sentencing, Mitigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Connor Wood
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of immediate imprisonment imposed on the appellant was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the judge erred in declining to suspend the appellant's sentence while suspending that of the co-defendant
- 3 Whether there was wrongful disparity in sentencing between co-defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred by not suspending the appellant's sentence given the cumulative effect of strong mitigation, low risk of reoffending, and prospects of rehabilitation, which outweighed the need for immediate custody in this case.
Court Disposition
sentence of immediate imprisonment quashed; replaced with suspended sentence
Orders
- 12 months imprisonment suspended for 24 months
- £1,000 compensation to be paid within 12 months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment