R v Conrad Howarth

The seriousness of the offence justified an increase to the top of the category range but not beyond it; the sentence imposed exceeded the appropriate range and was therefore excessive.

Parties: Appellant: Conrad Howarth; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 24 November 2022
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome: appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics: Sentencing, Terrorism Offences, Possession of Terrorist Material, Sentencing Guidelines

Criminal Law Counter Terrorism Sentencing Terrorism Offences Possession of Terrorist Material Sentencing Guidelines

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7

Parties

Conrad Howarth

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in uplifting the sentence beyond the guideline range due to legislative changes to the maximum sentence
2 Whether retention of the document was properly treated as an aggravating factor

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness of the offence justified an increase to the top of the category range but not beyond it; the sentence imposed exceeded the appropriate range and was therefore excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

Sentence on count 1 quashed and substituted with a special custodial sentence of 45 months and a one year extended licence.