Prescott Place Freeholder Ltd & Ors v Batin & Anor [2023] EWHC 435 (Ch) (03 March 2023)
It is an abuse of process for D2 to assert a beneficial interest in the property under a constructive trust or the 2014 Trust Deed, as these arguments should have been raised in the County Court or FTT proceedings. D2 is not barred from asserting rights under the Equitable Leases, but the court is critical of the timing and conduct surrounding their grant.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 435 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Prescott Place Freeholder Limited; Claimant: Thomas Philip Threlfall; Claimant: Ben Freeman; Claimant: Elena Blanca Baccini; Claimant: Kimberley Sum; Claimant: Esther Carragher; Claimant: Anne Camilla Frances Darling; Claimant: Edwina Mary Gillian Barker; Defendant: Constantin Batin; Defendant: Joseph Donovan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (injunction/property Trusts) / High Court Trial After County Court and FTT Proceedings
- Outcome
- D2 is barred from asserting a beneficial interest under a constructive trust or the 2014 Trust Deed by abuse of process. D2 may assert rights under the Equitable Leases, but the court is critical of the conduct.
- Legal Topics
- Right of First Refusal, Res Judicata, Constructive Trusts, Equitable Leases, Abuse of Process, Land Registration, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prescott Place Freeholder Limited
Claimant
Thomas Philip Threlfall
Claimant
Ben Freeman
Claimant
Elena Blanca Baccini
Claimant
Kimberley Sum
Claimant
Esther Carragher
Claimant
Anne Camilla Frances Darling
Claimant
Edwina Mary Gillian Barker
Claimant
Constantin Batin
Defendant
Joseph Donovan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (injunction/property Trusts) / High Court Trial After County Court and FTT Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether D2's claims to a beneficial interest or equitable leases are barred by abuse of process (Henderson v Henderson) or res judicata
- 2 Whether the 2014 Trust Deed and constructive trust arguments should have been raised in earlier proceedings
- 3 Whether the Equitable Leases granted after the Section 19 Order are binding on the Claimants
Ratio Decidendi
It is an abuse of process for D2 to assert a beneficial interest in the property under a constructive trust or the 2014 Trust Deed, as these arguments should have been raised in the County Court or FTT proceedings. D2 is not barred from asserting rights under the Equitable Leases, but the court is critical of the timing and conduct surrounding their grant.
Court Disposition
D2 is barred from asserting a beneficial interest under a constructive trust or the 2014 Trust Deed by abuse of process. D2 may assert rights under the Equitable Leases, but the court is critical of the conduct.
Orders
- D2's claims to a beneficial interest under a trust or the 2014 Trust Deed are struck out as an abuse of process.
- D2 is permitted to assert claims under the Equitable Leases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment