Burmarsh Ltd v Walters
The Court held that Clause 2.6 of the Deed of Assignment referred only to a final determination of the quantum of the Loss as defined in the recital, not to the commercial benefit obtained by the Assignee. The compromise with the Inland Revenue was not a final determination of quantum, so the full amount of the second instalment was payable.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Burmarsh Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Robert Walters
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Commercial Contracts, Capital Gains Tax, Assignment of Contingent Interests, Tax Avoidance Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burmarsh Ltd
Claimant/appellant
Robert Walters
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clause 2.6 of the Deed of Assignment required reduction of consideration based on the Inland Revenue's settlement
- 2 Proper construction of 'Loss' as defined in the Deed
- 3 Whether the compromise with the Inland Revenue constituted a final determination of quantum under Clause 2.6
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that Clause 2.6 of the Deed of Assignment referred only to a final determination of the quantum of the Loss as defined in the recital, not to the commercial benefit obtained by the Assignee. The compromise with the Inland Revenue was not a final determination of quantum, so the full amount of the second instalment was payable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment entered for £305,900 with interest at LIBOR plus 1 per cent from 19 January 2005 to payment
- Repayment of £126,000 paid re costs with interest at same rate from date of payment to repayment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment