Gill v Sandhu [2005] EWHC 43 (Ch) (26 January 2005)
The outgoing partner's entitlement under section 42 is to a share of profits attributable to the use of partnership assets, reflecting his proprietary share at the date of dissolution, not the net value after liabilities. The Master correctly awarded Mr Sandhu a half share of profits, subject to a fair return for Mr Gill's management services.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 43 (Ch)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Hardip Singh Gill; Respondent/claimant: Kulbir Singh Sandhu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Section 42 Partnership Act 1890, Entitlement of Outgoing Partner to Profits, Winding Up of Partnership, Distribution of Partnership Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hardip Singh Gill
Appellant/defendant
Kulbir Singh Sandhu
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Meaning of 'share of the partnership assets' under section 42 Partnership Act 1890
- 2 Entitlement of outgoing partner to profits made by continuing partner after dissolution
- 3 Basis for division of profits attributable to partnership assets
Ratio Decidendi
The outgoing partner's entitlement under section 42 is to a share of profits attributable to the use of partnership assets, reflecting his proprietary share at the date of dissolution, not the net value after liabilities. The Master correctly awarded Mr Sandhu a half share of profits, subject to a fair return for Mr Gill's management services.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mr Sandhu entitled to half share of profits made by Mr Gill after dissolution, subject to £22,000 per annum management charge to Mr Gill
- Interim payment of £25,000 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment