Day v Day [2006] EWCA Civ 415 (14 March 2006)
The claimant succeeded in obtaining a judgment for her share of the proceeds, and the defendant was required to pay; therefore, costs should follow the event and the claimant is entitled to all her costs, as the judge erred in treating the outcome as a draw and penalising her for not making a Part 36 offer.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 415
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Lilian Day; Defendant/respondent: Phillip Day
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Chancery Division
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Costs Discretion, CPR Part 36 Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lilian Day
Claimant/appellant
Phillip Day
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Chancery Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property was held on a constructive trust for John or as a resulting trust for Elsie and John
- 2 Whether the sum contributed by John was a gift
- 3 Appropriate apportionment of costs given the outcome
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant succeeded in obtaining a judgment for her share of the proceeds, and the defendant was required to pay; therefore, costs should follow the event and the claimant is entitled to all her costs, as the judge erred in treating the outcome as a draw and penalising her for not making a Part 36 offer.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellant awarded all costs of the claim on a standard basis to be assessed if not agreed
- Order substituted for previous costs order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment