Consult Group Ltd v The Pensions Regulator

Consult Group Ltd v The Pensions Regulator

The appellant failed to comply with explicit tribunal directions, having been warned that non-compliance could result in striking out. No further opportunity to make representations was required under the Rules. The proceedings were therefore struck out under Rule 8(3)(a).

Parties
Appellant: Consult Group Ltd; Respondent: The Pensions Regulator
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Strike Out Decision
Outcome
Appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Tribunal Procedure, Strike Out for Non Compliance, Appeal Requirements
Pensions Regulatory Law Tribunal Procedure Strike Out for Non Compliance Appeal Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Consult Group Ltd

Appellant

The Pensions Regulator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Strike Out Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be struck out for failure to comply with tribunal directions

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to comply with explicit tribunal directions, having been warned that non-compliance could result in striking out. No further opportunity to make representations was required under the Rules. The proceedings were therefore struck out under Rule 8(3)(a).

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out

Orders

  • Proceedings are struck out under Rule 8(3)(a) for failure to comply with a direction