Glossop Cartons and Print Ltd & Ors v Contact (Print and Packaging) Ltd & Ors
The defendants, through Mr Smith, made a fraudulent misrepresentation by failing to disclose a binding undertaking to disconnect the electricity supply to Unit 3, and by giving a misleading impression in pre-contractual correspondence and replies to enquiries. This misrepresentation was material, intended to induce, and did induce the claimants to enter into the transactions. The claimants are entitled to damages for all losses directly flowing from the transaction, subject to their duty to mitigate. The claims in relation to the electricity power and fencing representations fail, as does any claim for breach of warranty regarding the fence. The claimants are also entitled to a...
- Parties
- Claimant: Glossop Cartons and Print Limited; Claimant: Brian Sidebottom; Claimant: Jacqueline Cameron Sidebottom-Every; Claimant: Jillian Cameron Woodacre; Defendant: Contact (Print and Packaging) Limited; Defendant: Philip Smith; Defendant: Liberty Trustees Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/chancery) / Trial Judgment on Liability and Principles of Damages
- Outcome
- Claim in fraudulent misrepresentation (deceit) succeeds in relation to the electricity supply and flooding representations; fails in relation to the electricity power and fencing representations. Claimants entitled to damages and contractual indemnity for Brammall claim. Quantum to be determined at a further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Breach of Warranty, Indemnity, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glossop Cartons and Print Limited
Claimant
Brian Sidebottom
Claimant
Jacqueline Cameron Sidebottom-Every
Claimant
Jillian Cameron Woodacre
Claimant
Contact (Print and Packaging) Limited
Defendant
Philip Smith
Defendant
Liberty Trustees Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/chancery) / Trial Judgment on Liability and Principles of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants made fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations regarding the electricity supply, flooding, and fencing affecting Units 3, 4, and 5;
- 2 Whether there was breach of warranty and entitlement to indemnity under the sale agreements;
- 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to damages and/or indemnity for losses flowing from the transaction, including consequential losses.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants, through Mr Smith, made a fraudulent misrepresentation by failing to disclose a binding undertaking to disconnect the electricity supply to Unit 3, and by giving a misleading impression in pre-contractual correspondence and replies to enquiries. This misrepresentation was material, intended to induce, and did induce the claimants to enter into the transactions. The claimants are entitled to damages for all losses directly flowing from the transaction, subject to their duty to mitigate. The claims in relation to the electricity power and fencing representations fail, as does any claim for breach of warranty regarding the fence. The claimants are also entitled to a...
Court Disposition
Claim in fraudulent misrepresentation (deceit) succeeds in relation to the electricity supply and flooding representations; fails in relation to the electricity power and fencing representations. Claimants entitled to damages and contractual indemnity for Brammall claim. Quantum to be determined at a further hearing.
Orders
- Declaration of liability for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding electricity supply and flooding representations.
- Declaration of entitlement to damages for losses directly flowing from the transaction, subject to mitigation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment