Societe De Distribution De Toutes Merchandises En Cote D'Ivoire (t/a "SDTM-CI") & Ors v Continental Lines N.V. & Anor
The words 'at the expense and risk of Shippers/Charterers' in clause 5 of the Synacomex 90 Form charterparty are sufficiently clear to transfer responsibility for loading and discharge to the charterers and cargo interests; responsibility for stowage remains with the carrier by virtue of the specific provision in clause 5.
- Parties
- Claimant: Societe de Distribution de Toutes Merchandise en Cote D’Ivoire trading as SDTM-CI; Claimant: Kouma Assitan; Claimant: Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V.; Claimant: AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance; Defendant: Continental Lines N.V.; Defendant: Genshipping Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Cargo Claim / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue determined in favour of the carrier; responsibility for bad loading and discharge rests with charterers/cargo interests.
- Legal Topics
- Charterparty Interpretation, Allocation of Responsibility for Cargo Operations, Incorporation of Charterparty Terms Into Bill of Lading, Hague Rules Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Societe de Distribution de Toutes Merchandise en Cote D’Ivoire trading as SDTM-CI
Claimant
Kouma Assitan
Claimant
Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V.
Claimant
AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance
Claimant
Continental Lines N.V.
Defendant
Genshipping Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Cargo Claim / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 5 of the Synacomex 90 Form charterparty, as incorporated into the contracts of carriage, transfers responsibility for loading and discharge from the carrier to the charterers/cargo interests in clear terms
Ratio Decidendi
The words 'at the expense and risk of Shippers/Charterers' in clause 5 of the Synacomex 90 Form charterparty are sufficiently clear to transfer responsibility for loading and discharge to the charterers and cargo interests; responsibility for stowage remains with the carrier by virtue of the specific provision in clause 5.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue determined in favour of the carrier; responsibility for bad loading and discharge rests with charterers/cargo interests.
Orders
- To the extent that damage to the bags of rice was caused by bad loading and/or discharge (as opposed to bad stowage), that damage is the responsibility of the cargo interests who cannot recover in respect of such damage from the carrier.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment