Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd & Ors v LG Display Co Ltd & Anor [2022] EWCA Civ 423 (01 April 2022)
The judge below did not make a significant error of principle in weighing the connecting factors for forum conveniens; the issue of relative culpability between cartelists is central to the contribution claim and would require evidence best obtained in the Far East; the arguments and evidence presented did not establish that England is clearly the appropriate forum; appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 423
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd; Appellant/claimant: Samsung Electronics Taiwan Co. Ltd; Appellant/claimant: Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd; Appellant/claimant: Samsung Semiconductor Europe Ltd; Appellant/claimant: Samsung Display Co Ltd; Respondent/defendant: LG Display Co. Ltd; Respondent/defendant: LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Jurisdiction/service Out
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contribution Proceedings, Forum Conveniens, Article 101 TFEU, Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978, Follow on Damages, Binding Effect of Commission Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Samsung Electronics Taiwan Co. Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Samsung Semiconductor Europe Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Samsung Display Co Ltd
Appellant/claimant
LG Display Co. Ltd
Respondent/defendant
LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Jurisdiction/service Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether England is clearly the appropriate forum for contribution proceedings under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 following settlement of a cartel damages claim
- 2 Whether findings in the European Commission Decision are binding on the issue of relative culpability between cartelists
- 3 Whether the judge below erred in principle in weighing connecting factors for forum conveniens
Ratio Decidendi
The judge below did not make a significant error of principle in weighing the connecting factors for forum conveniens; the issue of relative culpability between cartelists is central to the contribution claim and would require evidence best obtained in the Far East; the arguments and evidence presented did not establish that England is clearly the appropriate forum; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order setting aside service out of jurisdiction stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment