John James William Booth v Simon White
The trial judge was entitled to find, on the facts, that the claimant was not negligent in failing to ask the defendant how much he had drunk, given the absence of evidence that the defendant was unfit to drive and the credible evidence from Mrs Booth. There is no legal requirement for a passenger to interrogate a driver about alcohol consumption in such circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: John James William Booth; Defendant/appellant: Simon White
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment on Liability in Personal Injury Claim
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Passenger Liability, Road Traffic Accidents, Assessment of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John James William Booth
Claimant/respondent
Simon White
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment on Liability in Personal Injury Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was contributorily negligent by failing to enquire about the defendant's alcohol consumption before accepting a lift
- 2 Whether a passenger must interrogate a driver about alcohol intake to avoid contributory negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to find, on the facts, that the claimant was not negligent in failing to ask the defendant how much he had drunk, given the absence of evidence that the defendant was unfit to drive and the credible evidence from Mrs Booth. There is no legal requirement for a passenger to interrogate a driver about alcohol consumption in such circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Public funding and detailed assessment ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment