David Parsons v Convatec Limited
The court approved costs budgets for both parties, applying principles of reasonableness and proportionality, making targeted reductions to Defendant's budget where luxury or excessive rates were identified, and adjusting Claimant's disclosure budget to reflect the less exacting nature of his disclosure exercise.
- Parties
- Claimant: David Parsons; Defendant: Convatec Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Budgeting Judgment Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Costs budgets approved with reductions; Defendant's budget reduced in several phases; Claimant's disclosure budget reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Patents, Costs Management, Costs Budgeting, Section 40 Patents Act 1977
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Parsons
Claimant
Convatec Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Budgeting Judgment Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate costs budgeting for both parties in a substantial patent claim
- 2 Application of s106 Patents Act 1977 to costs budgeting
- 3 Reasonableness and proportionality of costs incurred and estimated
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved costs budgets for both parties, applying principles of reasonableness and proportionality, making targeted reductions to Defendant's budget where luxury or excessive rates were identified, and adjusting Claimant's disclosure budget to reflect the less exacting nature of his disclosure exercise.
Court Disposition
Costs budgets approved with reductions; Defendant's budget reduced in several phases; Claimant's disclosure budget reduced.
Orders
- Defendant's CMC stage budget allowed at £170,000.
- Defendant's disclosure stage budget allowed at £1.3 million.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment