Schwarzschild v Harrods Ltd

Schwarzschild v Harrods Ltd

There was no sufficient basis for the Master to conclude that a limitation defence was bound to succeed, as it was not clear that a cause of action arose outside the limitation period. The requirements for statutory conversion—demand and unequivocal refusal—were not clearly established on the evidence, and disputed facts required trial. Summary judgment was therefore inappropriate.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Helga Henriette Schwarzschild; Respondent/defendant: Harrods Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Conversion, Limitation of Actions, Bailment, Summary Judgment
Tort Civil Procedure Conversion Limitation of Actions Bailment Summary Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Helga Henriette Schwarzschild

Appellant/claimant

Harrods Limited

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim for conversion was time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980
  2. 2 Whether there was an unequivocal demand and refusal sufficient to found a cause of action in statutory conversion under s.2(2) Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
  3. 3 Whether summary judgment was appropriate given disputed facts

Ratio Decidendi

There was no sufficient basis for the Master to conclude that a limitation defence was bound to succeed, as it was not clear that a cause of action arose outside the limitation period. The requirements for statutory conversion—demand and unequivocal refusal—were not clearly established on the evidence, and disputed facts required trial. Summary judgment was therefore inappropriate.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order for summary judgment set aside