Cook v Plummer [2008] EWCA Civ 484 (09 April 2008)
The applications for permission to appeal and to amend were refused because, despite jurisdictional arguments and alleged errors in the exercise of discretion, the Deputy Judge's decision was justified by the adequacy of the father's undertaking for maintenance and the appropriateness of New Zealand courts to assess the children's needs.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 484
- Parties
- Appellant: Cook; Respondent: Plummer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law) / Application for Permission to Appeal and to Amend Grounds of Appeal
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Forum Non Conveniens, Jurisdiction, Periodical Payments for Children, Undertakings, Discretionary Stays
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cook
Appellant
Plummer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law) / Application for Permission to Appeal and to Amend Grounds of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court had jurisdiction to grant a common-law forum non conveniens stay post-Owusu v Jackson
- 2 Whether the Deputy Judge erred in exercising discretion to grant a stay in favour of New Zealand courts
- 3 Whether the judge failed to consider all relevant factors in the discretionary balance
Ratio Decidendi
The applications for permission to appeal and to amend were refused because, despite jurisdictional arguments and alleged errors in the exercise of discretion, the Deputy Judge's decision was justified by the adequacy of the father's undertaking for maintenance and the appropriateness of New Zealand courts to assess the children's needs.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Permission to amend grounds of appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment