The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd & Ors v Meltwater Holding BV & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 890 (27 July 2011)
End-users of Meltwater News, in most cases, infringe copyright in headlines and article extracts by receiving and using the service, and require a licence from the publishers; statutory defences do not absolve liability, and double licensing is not unlawful as provider and end-user undertake distinct acts of copying.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 890
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: The Newspaper Licensing Agency Limited; Claimant/respondent: MGN Limited; Claimant/respondent: Associated Newspapers Limited; Claimant/respondent: Express Newspapers; Claimant/respondent: Guardian News and Media Limited; Claimant/respondent: Telegraph Media Group Limited; Claimant/respondent: Independent Print Limited; Defendant/appellant: Meltwater Holding BV; Defendant/appellant: Meltwater News UK Limited; Defendant/appellant: Public Relations Consultants Association Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Literary Works, Database Rights, Fair Dealing, Temporary Copies, Double Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Newspaper Licensing Agency Limited
Claimant/respondent
MGN Limited
Claimant/respondent
Associated Newspapers Limited
Claimant/respondent
Express Newspapers
Claimant/respondent
Guardian News and Media Limited
Claimant/respondent
Telegraph Media Group Limited
Claimant/respondent
Independent Print Limited
Claimant/respondent
Meltwater Holding BV
Defendant/appellant
Meltwater News UK Limited
Defendant/appellant
Public Relations Consultants Association Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Are newspaper headlines capable of being original literary works?
- 2 Do extracts from articles constitute a substantial part of the original literary work?
- 3 Do end-users infringe copyright by receiving and using Meltwater News?
Ratio Decidendi
End-users of Meltwater News, in most cases, infringe copyright in headlines and article extracts by receiving and using the service, and require a licence from the publishers; statutory defences do not absolve liability, and double licensing is not unlawful as provider and end-user undertake distinct acts of copying.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration modified: 'most if not all' members of PRCA require a licence or consent from publishers to lawfully receive and use Meltwater News.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment