Claimants v Corby Borough Council
Costs capping orders are appropriate in this group litigation to ensure costs are kept within bounds; caps should be set based on realistic estimates, with reductions reflecting excessive partner time and questionable increases, and a contingency allowance added.
- Parties
- Claimant: Claimants appearing in the Register of Claimants established by the Order of Master Turner dated 4th February 2006; Defendant: Corby Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Group Litigation / Costs Capping Order Determination
- Outcome
- Costs capping orders granted for both parties up to the end of the Generic Issues trial.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Capping, Case Management, Conditional Fee Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimants appearing in the Register of Claimants established by the Order of Master Turner dated 4th February 2006
Claimant
Corby Borough Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Group Litigation / Costs Capping Order Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs capping orders should be imposed and at what level in group litigation
- 2 Appropriate methodology for setting costs caps
- 3 Application of costs caps to future costs only
Ratio Decidendi
Costs capping orders are appropriate in this group litigation to ensure costs are kept within bounds; caps should be set based on realistic estimates, with reductions reflecting excessive partner time and questionable increases, and a contingency allowance added.
Court Disposition
Costs capping orders granted for both parties up to the end of the Generic Issues trial.
Orders
- Claimants' costs capped at £900,000 inclusive of VAT.
- Defendant's costs capped at £1,250,000 exclusive of VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment