R v Corey Burkitt

R v Corey Burkitt

The sentence of 12 months’ detention for possession of a bladed article was unlawful as the statutory criteria were not met for a 16-year-old, and the offence had already been considered in the murder sentence. The appropriate order is to quash the detention sentence and impose no separate penalty.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Corey Burkitt
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Unlawful Detention Order, Possession of Bladed Article, Murder, Youth Sentencing
Criminal Law Sentencing Unlawful Detention Order Possession of Bladed Article Murder Youth Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Corey Burkitt

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 12 months’ detention for possession of a bladed article was lawful for a 16-year-old convicted of murder
  2. 2 Whether a concurrent detention order can be imposed in these circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 12 months’ detention for possession of a bladed article was unlawful as the statutory criteria were not met for a 16-year-old, and the offence had already been considered in the murder sentence. The appropriate order is to quash the detention sentence and impose no separate penalty.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The sentence of 12 months’ detention on count 3 is quashed.
  • No separate penalty is imposed on count 3.