Cornwall Council v M & Ors [2023] EWFC 188 (02 November 2023)
The court has the power to make orders under section 8 Children Act 1989 or the inherent jurisdiction, but should not interfere with the police's statutory function to investigate crime where one parent with parental responsibility consents to a police interview of a child, except in highly exceptional circumstances. The circumstances of this case do not justify such intervention.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 188
- Parties
- Applicant: Cornwall Council; 1st Respondent: M; 2nd Respondent: F2; 3rd Respondent: C and K (by their Children's Guardian, Adele Stanbridge); 4th Respondent: F1; Intervenor: SM; Interested Party: Devon and Cornwall Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children Act Proceedings / Application for Prohibited Steps Order/specific Issue Order; Interim Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Prohibited Steps Order, Specific Issue Order, Parental Responsibility, Police Interview of Child, Achieving Best Evidence (abe) Guidance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cornwall Council
Applicant
M
1st Respondent
F2
2nd Respondent
C and K (by their Children's Guardian, Adele Stanbridge)
3rd Respondent
F1
4th Respondent
SM
Intervenor
Devon and Cornwall Police
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children Act Proceedings / Application for Prohibited Steps Order/specific Issue Order; Interim Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can prohibit a parent from consenting to a police interview of a child under section 8 Children Act 1989
- 2 Whether the police require consent of both parents with parental responsibility to interview a child
- 3 Whether the court should intervene to prevent the police from interviewing a child where one parent objects
Ratio Decidendi
The court has the power to make orders under section 8 Children Act 1989 or the inherent jurisdiction, but should not interfere with the police's statutory function to investigate crime where one parent with parental responsibility consents to a police interview of a child, except in highly exceptional circumstances. The circumstances of this case do not justify such intervention.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No prohibited steps order or specific issue order made against the father; police may proceed subject to welfare analysis and further assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment