Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

The Secretary of State was entitled to rely on the Environment Agency's expertise and guidance regarding emissions and the 1% rule. No binding legitimate expectation was created requiring the Secretary of State to conduct an independent assessment. The Forum failed to raise a substantive legal challenge to the 1% rule, and no unfairness resulted from the procedural posture adopted. The appeal is allowed and the Secretary of State's decision is confirmed.

Parties
Respondent: Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch; 1st Appellant: The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; 2nd Appellant: SITA Cornwall Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Secretary of State's decision confirmed
Legal Topics
Legitimate Expectation, Habitats Directive, Planning Permission, Environmental Permitting, Competent Authority Allocation
Administrative Law Environmental Law Planning Law Legitimate Expectation Habitats Directive Planning Permission Environmental Permitting Competent Authority Allocation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch

Respondent

The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

1st Appellant

SITA Cornwall Limited

2nd Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Secretary of State breached a legitimate expectation by not conducting an appropriate assessment under the Habitats Regulations
  2. 2 Whether the Secretary of State misdirected himself in law regarding planning matters and environmental permitting
  3. 3 Whether the challenge to the Environment Agency's use of the 1% rule was properly addressed

Ratio Decidendi

The Secretary of State was entitled to rely on the Environment Agency's expertise and guidance regarding emissions and the 1% rule. No binding legitimate expectation was created requiring the Secretary of State to conduct an independent assessment. The Forum failed to raise a substantive legal challenge to the 1% rule, and no unfairness resulted from the procedural posture adopted. The appeal is allowed and the Secretary of State's decision is confirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Secretary of State's decision confirmed

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The validity of the Secretary of State’s decision is confirmed.