Fons HF v Corporal Ltd & Anor
The definition of 'Shares' in Clause 1.1 of the Charge does not extend to include Fons’ rights under the SLAs; the terms 'other securities' and 'debentures' in context do not encompass unsecured loan agreements, and a reasonable objective observer would not interpret them as such.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fons HF (In Liquidation); Defendant: Corporal Limited; Defendant: Pillar Securitisation S.A.R.L.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; declaration granted that the SLAs are not caught by the charge.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Security Instruments, Definition of 'securities' and 'debentures', Shareholder Loan Agreements, Legal Charge Over Shares
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fons HF (In Liquidation)
Claimant
Corporal Limited
Defendant
Pillar Securitisation S.A.R.L.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clause 3.1.1 of the Legal Charge extends to Fons’ rights under shareholder loan agreements (SLAs)
- 2 Interpretation of 'other securities' and 'debentures' in the charge definition
Ratio Decidendi
The definition of 'Shares' in Clause 1.1 of the Charge does not extend to include Fons’ rights under the SLAs; the terms 'other securities' and 'debentures' in context do not encompass unsecured loan agreements, and a reasonable objective observer would not interpret them as such.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; declaration granted that the SLAs are not caught by the charge.
Orders
- No need for parties to attend handing down of judgment.
- If costs and outstanding matters are agreed, submit draft order for approval.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment