Corvan (Properties) Ltd v Abdel-Mahmoud
Clause 5 of the management agreement mandates continuation beyond the initial twelve months, making the minimum commitment more than twelve months. Therefore, the agreement is a qualifying long term agreement under section 20ZA(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, and the statutory consultation requirements apply.
- Parties
- Appellant: Corvan (Properties) Ltd; Respondent: Abdel-Mahmoud
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Upper Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Qualifying Long Term Agreement, Service Charges, Statutory Interpretation, Contract Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corvan (Properties) Ltd
Appellant
Abdel-Mahmoud
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Upper Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the management agreement was for a term of more than twelve months and thus a qualifying long term agreement under section 20ZA(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- 2 Proper construction of clause 5 of the management agreement
- 3 Correct interpretation of 'term' in section 20ZA(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 5 of the management agreement mandates continuation beyond the initial twelve months, making the minimum commitment more than twelve months. Therefore, the agreement is a qualifying long term agreement under section 20ZA(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, and the statutory consultation requirements apply.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; the management agreement is a qualifying long term agreement under section 20ZA(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment