Phipps, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1104 (2 August 2021)

The Court held that the original sentence was not manifestly excessive and was within the appropriate range given the circumstances of the offence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2021] EWCA Crim 1104
Parties: Prosecution: R; Appellant: Cory Phipps
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 02 August 2021
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Sentence Appeal, Sentencing Guidelines

Criminal Law Sentence Appeal Sentencing Guidelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Prosecution

Cory Phipps

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the sentence imposed on Cory Phipps was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the original sentence was not manifestly excessive and was within the appropriate range given the circumstances of the offence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.