Edwards & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Environment Agency & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 1138 (19 July 2006)
Respondents entitled to 70% of their costs, apportioned between appellants and Legal Services Commission, with specific limits and determination by costs judge; no order for interested parties' costs; permission to appeal refused.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1138
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Edwards; Claimant/appellant: Pallikaropoulos; Defendant/respondent: The Environment Agency & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Costs and Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; costs awarded; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeals, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwards
Claimant/appellant
Pallikaropoulos
Claimant/appellant
The Environment Agency & Ors
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Costs and Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement and apportionment of costs following dismissal of appeals
- 2 Permission to appeal to House of Lords
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents entitled to 70% of their costs, apportioned between appellants and Legal Services Commission, with specific limits and determination by costs judge; no order for interested parties' costs; permission to appeal refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; costs awarded; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Respondents awarded 70% of their costs, apportioned as specified.
- No order for interested parties' costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment