Barracks v Chief Superintendent Coles & Ors
Although the appeal was dismissed, the court found that the respondents' conduct in raising a hopeless abuse of process argument contributed to the problems in the case. Therefore, the appropriate order was no order as to costs, and the substantive legal questions should be determined by the Employment Tribunal after hearing evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Janet Barracks; Defendant/respondent: Chief Superintendent John Coles; Defendant/respondent: The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Intervenor: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Abuse of Process, Race Discrimination, European Community Law, Convention Rights Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Janet Barracks
Claimant/appellant
Chief Superintendent John Coles
Defendant/respondent
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
Defendant/respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be allowed or dismissed
- 2 Appropriate order for costs following dismissal of appeal
- 3 Whether the proceedings were an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
Although the appeal was dismissed, the court found that the respondents' conduct in raising a hopeless abuse of process argument contributed to the problems in the case. Therefore, the appropriate order was no order as to costs, and the substantive legal questions should be determined by the Employment Tribunal after hearing evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed on the terms set out in the court’s judgment.
- Case remitted to the Employment Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment