Edwards & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Environment Agency & Ors
The respondents are entitled to 70% of their costs, apportioned between the appellants and/or the Legal Services Commission, with specific provisions for costs incurred before and after 1.00pm on 8 February 2006. The second appellant's liability for costs is capped at £2,000. Permission to appeal to the House of Lords is refused.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellants: The Queen on the Application of Edwards and Pallikaropoulos; Defendant/respondent: The Environment Agency & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Respondents awarded 70% of costs; second appellant's application for permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the Application of Edwards and Pallikaropoulos
Claimant/appellants
The Environment Agency & Ors
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement and apportionment of costs following dismissal of appeals
- 2 Permission to appeal to the House of Lords
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents are entitled to 70% of their costs, apportioned between the appellants and/or the Legal Services Commission, with specific provisions for costs incurred before and after 1.00pm on 8 February 2006. The second appellant's liability for costs is capped at £2,000. Permission to appeal to the House of Lords is refused.
Court Disposition
Respondents awarded 70% of costs; second appellant's application for permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Respondents to have 70% of their costs paid by appellants and/or Legal Services Commission, apportioned as specified.
- No order as to interested parties' costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment